In the upper left corner of my screen is former Virginia governor Mark Warner delivering his lunchtime/campaign speech live at YearlyKos (actually he’s just finished and been replaced by a pretty-funny Bush impersonator). I got up at 8am on a Saturday just to watch Howard Dean’s morning keynote address. And now I’m blogging about it. Clearly there is something seriously wrong with me.
Following Dean’s speech, I switched over to the Framing the Debate panel featuring George Lakoff and Jim Derych, author of Confessions of a Former Dittohead. The panel was carried on CSPAN as well, as it turns out, which I had DVRed for later viewing. I figured CSPAN would cover the main ballroom featuring the star attractions, not the smaller, half-empty Room 3, but I was wrong.
Anyway, this seems like a good time to talk about Confessions, which I finished last weekend. It’s an easy, conversational read, and a dedicated reader can blow through it in an afternoon. It’s kinda like a really long blog post. Two blog posts, actually — the first half recounts Derych’s transformation from conservative dittohead to liberal activist, and the second half covers ways to talk to other dittoheads and get past the “right-wing reasoning chips” in their heads.
In the latter respect, the book isn’t as useful as I’d hoped. On several topics in part 2, Derych essentially throws his hands up and says “I don’t know how to engage a dittohead on this.” His own conversion was initiated by a college roommate who hid his homosexuality from Derych out of fear and a female friend who shared the story of her abortion at age 15. (Her story is retold in the book.) Both events shattered his illusions about the types of people who are gay or have abortions, but other dittoheads may not be lucky enough to know people like them.
For all that, it’s still an interesting read, and I discovered some things I didn’t know. For example, Derych explains how one rock of conservative belief — “tax cuts raise revenue, and Reagan proved it” — is false, but based on enough truth to mislead. Reagan lowered taxes but also revamped the tax code to abolish most deductions. Money that used to go into loss-generating activities for tax purposes were redirected into the economy. More recently, Dubya’s tax cuts came without similar reforms — by Bush’s own (probably optimistic) estimations, only 17% of his tax cuts have been made up in new revenue. Hence, $3 trillion in new debt and counting.
There’s one very minor story in the book that jumped out at me: after becoming a liberal and volunteering for Kerry, Derych went on a local conservative radio show.
Reason be damned, right-wingers insisted that Kerry’s having brought an 8mm handicam with him to Vietnam was somehow proof of his phony and ambitious nature. I thought this didn’t make a lick of sense. So when Mike asked me, “Why else would he have brought a camera to Vietnam?” I responded, “My parents gave me a video camera to take with me to college in Knoxville. It’s not uncommon for kids to have a camera with them during their college years!” Mike was unimpressed. “There’s a big difference between Knoxville and Vietnam, Jim.” To which I replied, “You’re right, Mike! There’s a hell of a lot more stuff to see in Vietnam!”
What strikes me about this exchange is that Ron gave me the same story during the 2004 election, as proof of Kerry’s phony and ambitious nature. And he was even a Kerry supporter! I read the blogs pretty copiously at the time, and this was the first I’d ever heard that criticism. Ron didn’t have time to really follow the news, yet the meme filtered through to him.
How does that work? What mechanisms launch these memes right past people like me yet still circulate to the apolitical masses? Is it the fault of the so-called liberal media? Or is it really as simple as dittoheads spreading the word in their spare time, one co-worker or brother-in-law at a time?
Whatever it is, it’s killing Democrats in national elections. We saw the same thing in 2000 with Gore’s supposed claim that he invented the Internet — something he never actually said. Perhaps the rise of the liberal blogs will start spreading new memes to the masses, but until then, we can Frame the Debate all we like, and it won’t make a difference in presidential races.